Prediction of Nicolai Budkov Kjaer [307th] vs Naoya Honda [829th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L L L
Form
W L W L L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Kjaer 0 - 0 Honda
| Kjaer | Stats | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 307 | Ranking | 829 |
| 287 | Highest Rank | 829 |
| 18 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 63% (40-23) | Career Total W/L | 52% (23-21) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Naoya Honda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kjaer 0 - 0 Honda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kjaer has won 43.54% of points on their second serve, while Honda has won 47.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kjaer, in recent form, has won 43.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Honda has won 51.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.3% and 27.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kjaer has saved 52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Honda has saved 57.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kjaer has won 63.27% of matches played (W/L 31/ 18), with Honda winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kjaer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 13/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Honda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Kjaer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 18/ 6), where as Honda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kjaer has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.18 while Honda has played against players with an average rank of 211.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kjaer has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Honda has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kjaer has converted 33.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Honda has converted 33.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Naoya Honda Best Odds For The Match
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Carlos Taberner
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
41%
(
15 of
37)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
37 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Justin Engel
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoya Honda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Naoya Honda
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
22 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Maxence Bertimon
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
11 of
18)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
18
Total Points Won
16
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Naoya Honda
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Lucas Poullain
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Naoya Honda
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
6
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
8
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Naoya Honda
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Ignasi Forcano
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
4
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Naoya Honda
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
51
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Kjaer vs Honda?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kjaer Vs Honda is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (40/23) | Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) |
| 61% (89/56) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (50/49) |
| 54% (736/632) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (476/466) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 178 | Aces Total | 83 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 129 | Total Double Faults | 129 |
| 1:33:14 | Average Match Time | 1:20:43 |
| 238.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 180.2 |
| 61% (2361/3849) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1419/2405) |
| 67% (1586/2361) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (938/1419) |
| 53% (787/1488) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (461/986) |
| 48% (188/392) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (83/209) |
| 42% (1615/3839) | Return Points Win % | 39% (908/2338) |
| 65% (40/62) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (10/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 55% (11/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (7/12) |
| 92% (36/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 8% (36/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 26% (27/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (19/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
